Menu
A recent decision from the California Court of Appeals serves as a critical reminder that revoking a will is not as simple as writing a statement of intent. In Estate of Boyajian, the appellate court emphasized the importance of following the statutory requirements outlined in the California Probate Code when attempting to revoke a testamentary document.
In this case, the decedent, Layla Boyajian, had executed a holographic will (handwritten will) in 2006, leaving her estate to her daughter, Anush. Years later, in 2018, Layla signed a notarized document, drafted by her son, Robert, stating that all prior estate planning documents were "void." This document, however, did not include any new instructions for distributing her assets. It was also not physically attached to or marked on the original 2006 will.
When Layla passed away, conflicting interpretations of her intent arose. A trial court initially accepted the 2018 revocation document as valid. But on appeal, the decision was reversed, resulting in the 2006 handwritten will being valid.
Under California Probate Code § 6120, a will can only be revoked in one of two ways:
(a) A subsequent will which revokes the prior will or part expressly or by inconsistency.
(b) Being burned, torn, canceled, obliterated, or destroyed, with the intent and for the purpose of revoking it, by either (1) the testator or (2) another person in the testator’s presence and by the testator’s direction.
The term testamentary refers to anything related to the disposition of property after death, typically in the context of a will or trust. A testamentary document, such as a will or codicil, expresses a person's intentions regarding the distribution of their estate after their death. It is a legal document designed to take effect upon the person's passing.
In Estate of Boyajian, the Court of Appeal found that the 2018 document failed on both counts:
As a result, the appellate court ruled that the 2006 holographic will remained valid and should be admitted to probate.
This case highlights a common misconception: that a general statement revoking a will, no matter how well-intentioned, is sufficient to change an estate plan. The reality is much more complex.
Here are a few important lessons from this case:
If you are in the Sacramento area and need assistance with probate, trust administration, or will preparation, it is crucial to work with an experienced attorney who understands the complexities of California law. This case serves as a reminder that small mistakes can have significant consequences for your loved ones and your legacy.
At Huber Law Group, we specialize in probate and trust administration throughout Sacramento and the surrounding areas. Whether you are looking to create a will, update a revocable living trust, or navigate the probate process, we are here to ensure your wishes are properly documented and legally enforceable.
At Huber Law Group, we frequently counsel clients on probate administration and trust litigation. Whether you are handling a loved one's estate or looking to make changes to your own estate plan, it is important to understand the legal process and avoid common pitfalls like the one in Estate of Boyajian.
If you are considering changes to your estate plan or are involved in a probate dispute in Sacramento, we strongly recommend speaking with an experienced estate planning attorney. We’re here to help you ensure that your intentions are honored and your documents are legally sound.
If you are facing a probate matter or need guidance with your trust administration or estate planning in Sacramento, reach out to us at Huber Law Group. Our team of skilled attorneys is here to help you navigate complex legal issues with confidence and clarity.
Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
© 2026 Huber Law Group
| View Our Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm